Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hendrick v. Dean, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Larnell E. Hendrick
Defendant:
Robert Dean, Jr., Lieutnant Ahmed, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01101
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Robert Dean Thomas
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant Davis v. Darius Horton
as 24-6299
Plaintiff:
BRYANT E. DAVIS, a/k/a Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
DARIUS HORTON, EXPRESS FUNERAL FUNDING, LLC, HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Aurel v. Alston et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Lt. Alston, India White, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. ViaPath Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
ViaPath Technologies, Olan Owolabi, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Selvin v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Romero Leon Selvin
Defendant:
Warden Robert Dean, Yes Care, Inc., Nicole Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Spearson v. USA
as 9:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
Robert Dean Spearson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Spearson
as 23-3553
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT DEAN SPEARSON
Collins v. Dean
as 1:2023cv03108
Petitioner:
Rubin Arnaz Collins
Respondent:
Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
