Cases filed in New York
Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Aucoin et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11803
Plaintiff: John Simadis, Evelyn Torres, Edward Springer and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Aluotto et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11459
Plaintiff: Anthony Reyes, William Lappe, Luis Orsini and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv06841
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sutton et al v. RMS Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv07319
Plaintiff: Rohan Green and Albert Sutton
Defendant: Reliant Realty Services LLC, Omni America LLC, RMS Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gary v. The City Of New York , et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05435
Plaintiff: Nailah Gary
Defendant: City of New York, Rohan Lumsden, Joseph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Fierro et al
as 6:2018cv06434
Plaintiff: Adam Christopher Walker
Defendant: Scott Fierro, James Wellington, Todd Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States et al
as 2:2018cv02817
Defendant: Suffolk County Police Departmrnt, County Of Suffolk Treasurer, County Of Nassau and others
Plaintiff: Rohan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CC Management USA LLC v. Johnson
as 2:2018mc00098
Movant: CC Management USA LLC
Respondent: Rohan Johnson
Interested Party: United States of America
IS3 Properties, LLC v. Johnson
as 2:2017mc03037
Plaintiff: IS3 Properties, LLC
Defendant: Rohan Johnson
Dixon v. Huffman et al
as 1:2017cv03349
Plaintiff: Thomas Dixon
Defendant: Huffman, Elberth, D. Ladenhauf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?