Cases 31 - 40 of 390
Richard Salmon v. Brad Cain, et al
as 23-35137
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD W. SALMON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional Institution and OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
Respondent:
MARK NOOTH, OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE and ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, The Attorney General of the State
D'Angelo et al v. D'Annunzio et al
as 2:2023cv01322
Plaintiff:
Steven D'angelo, Steveline, Inc. and Steven P. D'Angelo
Counter Defendant:
SPG Sheridan Group LLC and Lawrence Rubin
Counter Claimant:
Arthur D'Annunzio, Jewelry Designer Showcase, Inc., PPAD Inc. & Associates and others
Defendant:
Paul J. DeVito, DeVito & DeVito, P.C., Williams & Foster Consulting Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
American Apparel & Footwear Association, Inc., et al v. Dave Baden, et al
as 23-35114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION, INC., HALLOWEEN INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INC., JUVENILE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES SCHROEDER, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Oregon Health Authority, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Oregons Department of Justice and DAVE BADEN, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Oregon Health Authority
Ortega v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Michael Ortega
Respondent:
Ellen Rosenblum and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Chad Samuel William Pearson
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere, Attorney General of the State of Oregon and Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc., et al v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-36011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OREGON FIREARMS FEDERATION, INC., an Oregon public benefit corporation, BRAD LOHREY, Sherman County Sheriff, ADAM JOHNSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, Governor of the State of Oregon and ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, in both their official and personal capacities
Azzopardi et al v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2022cv01869
Plaintiff:
Daniel Azzopardi and Sportsman's Warehouse, Inc.
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum, Terri Davie and Oregon Hunters Association
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eyre et al v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
Katerina B Eyre, Tim Freeman, Mazama Sporting Goods and others
Defendant:
Ellen F Rosenblum, Terri Davie and Oregon Hunters Association
Intervenor Defendant:
Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Fitz et al v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2022cv01859
Plaintiff:
Mark Fitz, Grayguns, Inc., G4 Archery, LLC and others
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum and Terri Davie
Amicus Curiae:
Oregon Hunters Association, Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc. et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc., Brad Lohrey, Adam Johnson and others
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown and Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon State Shooting Association, Mazama Sporting Goods, Tim Freeman and others
Amicus Curiae:
Oregon Hunters Association, Gun Owners of America Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Terri Davie and Ellen F Rosenblum
Intervenor Defendant:
Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
