Cases 1 - 10 of 388
Gabriel v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dean Gabriel
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen Rosenblum and Meagan Aileen Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. Wray
as 24-50304
Plaintiff:
Carviel Gordon Dillard
Defendant:
FBI Director FNU Wray, Attorney General FNU Garland, Attorney General FNU Rosenblum and others
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. Rosenblum
as 6:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.
Defendant:
Ellen F. Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeanne Hedgepeth v. James Britton, et al
as 24-1427
Plaintiff:
JEANNE HEDGEPETH
Defendant:
JAMES A. BRITTON, KIMBERLY CAVILL, ANNA KLIMKOWICZ and others
Foshee v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
P.R. Penny Foshee and Penny Foshee
Defendant:
Lane County, Attorney General Ellen F Rosenblum, Director Betsy Imholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Rosenblum
as 24-1274
Plaintiff:
IAN LEONARD CLARK
Defendant:
ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Attorney General
McCrary v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Mike Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hafner v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Oregon Attorney General, in her official capacity, TINA KOTEK, Oregon Governor, in her official capacity and others
Maureen Rosenblum v. Regions Bank et al
as 2:2024cv02009
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Maureen Rosenblum
Defendant:
Regions Bank and Regions Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
