Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Butler v. Greenwood County Sheriffs Office et al
as 8:2013cv00941
Plaintiff:
Stanley Brent Butler
Defendant:
Greenwood County Sheriffs Office and Scott Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Rush et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Norris Allen Martin
Defendant:
F Emory Rush, Michael R Culler, Jr, Jack Colman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rush et al v. Agape Senior LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00666
Defendant:
Agape Senior LLC , Agape Senior Services Inc , Agape Senior Services Foundation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Rush , Belinda Pickett , Tamara Keitt and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rushing v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA et al
as 6:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Rushing
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA and Bolt Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rush v. State, The
as 4:2012cv00814
Petitioner:
David Lewis Rush
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LB Ventures Inc v. Rush Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02143
Defendant:
Rush Enterprises LLC, John Rush, Sr, Kathleen Rush and others
Plaintiff:
LB Ventures Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rush v. Patterson et al
as 2:2010cv01937
Plaintiff:
Tony Rush
Defendant:
Dennis Patterson, McKither Bodison, Fred Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Patterson et al
as 8:2010cv01937
Plaintiff:
Tony Rush
Defendant:
Dennis Patterson , McKither Bodison , Fred Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden v. Rushing et al
as 6:2007cv02985
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Bolden
Defendant:
Brent Rushing, James Matthews Culberton and Simpsonville Police Department, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rush v. Stevenson
as 8:2007cv02306
Petitioner:
William Rush
Respondent:
Robert M Stevenson, III
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
