Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Samuel R. Jackson v. Jennifer Holley
as 16-6896
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAMUEL R. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellant:
JENNIFER HOLLEY, Psychologist
Defendant:
DAVID MAY, MR. FUTRELLE, Psychologist Program Manager, VERDEEN B. BENJAMIN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and others
Jackson v. The State of Texas
as 1:2016cv00812
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Jackson, II v. United State
as 16-2468
Petitioner:
Samuel Beck Jackson, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Jackson v. The State of Texas
as 4:2016cv01580
Petitioner:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Defendant:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00237
Petitioner:
Samuel Beck Jackson, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Samuel Jackson v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-11359
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL ANDRE JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Samuel Junior Jackson v. Sher Guleria
as 16-6135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JUNIOR JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. SHER GULERIA
Defendant:
N.C. D.O.C. MEDICAL STAFF and DR. JOSEPH LIGHTSEY
Jackson v. USA
as 4:2016cv00029
Petitioner:
Samuel Beck Jackson, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Samuel Jackson v. Marla Magana
as 16-6031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL R. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE MARLA MAGANA, DR. ROBERT OWENS and DR. ELIZABETH BYRD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DENNIS DANIELS
Samuel Jackson v. Eddie Hart
as 15-7946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL R. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE HART, CHARLIE HARGROVE, JOYCE COZART and others
Defendant:
DR. JOSEPH LIGHTSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
