Cases 31 - 40 of 261
Dismuke v. Owens et al
as 3:2022cv50174
Plaintiff:
Stedman Pierre Dismuke
Defendant:
Owens, Winnebago County Jail, Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt et al v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv00605
In Re:
Service List
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Lisa M. Hill Wyatt, R.L. Smith, Jr. and others
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Mac M. Thornberry, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tidwell v. Epplin et al
as 3:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
Cleother Tidwell
Defendant:
R. Epplin and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. W.C.A.D.F. et al
as 1:2022cv01415
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
W.C.A.D.F., Dale Santerelli, Bernadette Landeros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpenter v. CCDOC Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Stanley M Carpenter
Defendant:
CCDOC Cook County Jail, Yu, Cermak Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv06863
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Terry
Defendant:
Carlos Doe, Nancy Doe, Jackie Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2021cv00202
Petitioner:
William Fuller, III
Defendant:
Service List
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Rafferty et al
as 1:2021cv06348
Plaintiff:
Antonio Moore and Service List
Defendant:
Sgt. Rafferty, Fto Powell, C/O Lozada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cook County IL et al
as 1:2021cv06245
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Defendant:
Cook County IL, Cook County Jail Staff, Cermak Health Service Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Champius et al
as 1:2021cv05025
Plaintiff:
Niesha S Gates
Defendant:
Peggy Champius, Joy Tull and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
