Cases 31 - 40 of 5,111
Shead et al v. State of Texas Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Travarus Shead, Enrique Guerra and Barry Emmett
Defendant:
State of Texas Corporation, Greg Abbot, TDCJ Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sanchez
as 24-40181
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Warden, Isaac Kwarteng, Medical Director, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Ronald Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 24-1352
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. STRECK, STATE OF NEW YORK and STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40306
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40308
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40309
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
State of Texas v. EPA, et al
as 24-1100
Petitioner:
State of Texas
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Konecny v. State of Texas, et al
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS and others
Krikie v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01054
Petitioner:
David Paul Krikie
Respondent:
State of Texas and Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
