Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 102
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Plaintiff: AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant: RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER et al v. PALACE ELITE RESORTS, S.A. DE C.V. et al
as 2:2018cv00319
Plaintiff: KELSEY T. BAKER and FRANK W. BAKER
Defendant: PALACE ELITE RESORTS, S.A. DE C.V., MY TIMESHARE OPTIONS, DAN BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ELLMAN et al v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2018cv00258
Plaintiff: BRIAN ELLMAN, NIGEL SANTANA, DAVE BELINDA and others
Defendant: JANINE QUIGLEY, STEPHANIE SMITH, CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00016
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Santana v. USA
as 1:2017cv01423
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Fremo Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
OCASIO-SANTANA v. MOONEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv03168
Petitioner: LUIS MANUEAL OCASIO-SANTANA
Respondent: MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santana v. USA
as 1:2016cv01748
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jonathan Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Santana et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01478
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Christian F. Santana, Oriza Dotel, Christian L. Santana and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
MALLARD v. MCDERMOTT et al
as 2:2015cv05432
Plaintiff: KENNETH MALLARD
Defendant: MICHEAL I. MCDERMOTT and JOCELYNE SANTANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUZON v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2015cv00225
Petitioner: WARREN KUZON
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, JOSE SANTANA and S. MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?