Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Saunders v. Mitchell
as 8:2011cv00156
Petitioner:
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr
Respondent:
Mary M Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Spine Synergy of the Carolinas LLC et al
as 7:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
David Fowler
Defendant:
Spine Synergy of the Carolinas LLC, Mike Jones and Chad Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Saunders v. DeWitt
as 3:2009cv03290
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Leroy Saunders, III
Defendant:
H Wayne DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Saunders v. Mitchell
as 8:2009cv01134
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr
Defendant:
Mary M Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. Saunders et al
as 4:2009cv00463
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Defendant:
Michael Saunders, Lynn Saunders, Melissa Lee Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Saunders v. LaManna
as 8:2008cv03333
Petitioner:
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr
Respondent:
John J LaManna
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Wanda Scott
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Abbeville County, Abbeville, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv03743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
