Cases 31 - 40 of 55
KULL v. ACHE et al
as 5:2011cv03207
Plaintiff:
KEITH KULL
Defendant:
PAUL ACHE , ANKE WALZ , DEBORAH FRANZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHAEFFER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64788
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A SCHAEFFER and MILDRED SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHAEFFER et al V. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2011cv63453
Plaintiff:
THERESA SCHAEFFER and GORDON K. SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price et al v. Scranton School District
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Barbara Price and George Price
Defendant:
Scranton School District , Robert Lesh , Robert Sheridan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv04281
Plaintiff:
TYREL S. DORN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, 12TH DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHAEFFER v. KINIRY et al
as 3:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
STONEY LEE SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
PATRICK T. KINIRY, KAREN FUGINI and KELLY CALLIHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHAEFFER v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33994
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SCHAEFFER v. COLLECTO, INC.
as 2:2009cv02428
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
COLLECTO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ball v. Lamas et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Lamas, Wright, Lt. Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
