Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Hunt v. Hentz et al
as 3:2012cv01606
Plaintiff:
Gary Hunt , Paul Hunt and Scott Hunt
Defendant:
Donald A. Hentz , Paul Zimmerer , Linda Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv06371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hunt v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
as 11-4777
Plaintiff:
Francis Scott Hunt, individually and as Trustee for Ian Christopher Hunt, Paul Lewicki, Lawrence A. McMahon, and Judith J. McMahon, Sundra Cheri Hunt, individually and as Trustee for Ian Christopher Hunt, Paul Lewicki, Lawrence A. McMahon and Judith J. McMahon, Paul D. Cavanagh, individually and as Trustee for the Paul D. Davanagh Trust and others
Appellant:
Dan Brecher
Defendant - Appellee:
Enzo Biochem, Inc., Heiman Gross, Barry Weiner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pasquale v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. et al
as 5:2011cv04299
Plaintiff:
Eugene C Pasquale
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. , Hunt & Henriques , Michael Scott Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv12712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
