Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Donna Bond v. U. S. Postal Service Federal
as 16-1047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA BOND
Defendant - Appellee:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Donaldson v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01251
Cross Claimant:
Ancira Nissan, Inc.
Defendant:
Ancira Nissan, Inc., Nissan North America, Inc. and Security Service Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Naomi Donaldson
Cross Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gutierrez et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01250
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gutierrez and Christine Gutierrez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., Benson Nissan, Inc. and Security Service Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Bond v. U.S.Postal Service Federal Credit Union
as 8:2015cv00699
Defendant:
U.S.Postal Service Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Donna Bond
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Roicki v. Cenlar F.S.B. et al
as 5:2014cv00876
Defendant:
Cenlar F.S.B. and Security Service Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Drew Roicki
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00170
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Security Service Federal Credit Union v. Nicholas Karyotakis
as 2:2013cv05217
Defendant:
Nicholas Karyotakis
Plaintiff:
Security Service Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Security Service Federal Credit Union v. Nicholas Karyotakis
as 2:2013mc00110
Defendant:
Nicholas Karyotakis
Plaintiff:
Security Service Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
