Cases 31 - 40 of 475
Traymonte Snipes v. State of Florida
as 23-12600
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAYMONTE BIRTANNE SNIPES
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Snipes v. State of Florida
as 2:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Traymonte B. Snipes
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snipes v. State of Florida
as 8:2023cv01644
Plaintiff:
Traymonte B. Snipes
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snipes v. Aglin et al
as 2:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Traymonte B. Snipes
Defendant:
Deputy R. Aglin, Deputy Lopez, Deputy Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
ARNETTE TAYLOR, CASSIUS CALDWELL, CHAD HERRING and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
United States of America v. Shelton (Ross)
as 23-6401
Defendant:
BUSHAWN SHELTON, HERMAN BLANCO, ARTHUR CODNER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HIMEN ROSS and Ace
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amaro Cisneros v. Peacock et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tandy Amaro Cisneros
Defendant:
Denise Peacock, David Gilbert, Hillary Gurney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Jackson
as 23-6281
Defendant:
AMAR SCOTT, YULANDER GREEN, JERRICK DENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON, Boosum and Boots
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Snipes v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv17935
Plaintiff:
Wanda Snipes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Traymonte Snipes v. P. Pavese, et al
as 23-10635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAYMONTE BIRTANNE SNIPES
Defendant / Appellee:
P. PAVESE, ROSE and R. SUTTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
