Cases 31 - 40 of 422
Brown (PS) v. CDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ra Brown
Defendant:
CDOC, Core Civic, Moses Andre Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Biden, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO P. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, et al., MAYORKAS, et al., DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS, GOVERNOR J. POLIS, et al. and others
Lattimore (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Kenyada Antwun Lattimore
Respondent:
Moses Stancil and Jason Lengfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson (PS) v. Wieser et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Phillip Wieser, Jill Brady, Michael Hegarty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giovanni (PS) v. Ensey et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Petitioner:
Sean Giovanni, Sean Giovanni also known as Sean Ludwigsen and Sean Ludwigsen
Respondent:
Ensey and Moses Andre Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stetzel (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv03432
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow, Hannah Feldhacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Hendley et al
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey and Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
FNU Hendley, Kizer Jr Morgon, FNU Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Johnson v. Johnson, et al
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON, MOSES STANCIL, PLANNEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
