Cases 31 - 40 of 1,966
Louviere v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Russ Louviere
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dusel et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv11072
Plaintiff:
Alan J. Dusel and Brenda S. Dusel
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp Individually doing business as Stryker Orthpaedics and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stryker Corporation v. OsteoMed LLC
as 23-2012
Appellant:
STRYKER CORPORATION and WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Appellee:
OSTEOMED LLC
Stryker Corporation v. OsteoMed LLC
as 23-2010
Appellant:
STRYKER CORPORATION and WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Appellee:
OSTEOMED LLC
Stryker Corporation v. OsteoMed LLC
as 23-2011
Appellant:
STRYKER CORPORATION and WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Appellee:
OSTEOMED LLC
OsteoMed LLC v. Stryker Corporation
as 23-1979
Appellant:
OSTEOMED LLC
Appellee:
STRYKER CORPORATION and WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al v. Stryker Corporation
as 1:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., Hill-Rom Company Incorporated and Hill-Rom Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Mekley v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 1:2023cv11203
Plaintiff:
Darlene F Mekley
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Merz et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10876
Plaintiff:
James Merz and Kristen Merz
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corp., and Howmedica Osteonics Corp Individually doing business as STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stryker Corporation v. OsteoMed LLC
as 23-1928
Appellant:
STRYKER CORPORATION and WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Appellee:
OSTEOMED LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
