Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLANTE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02697
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE PLANTE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOTEP-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01567
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOE HOGSETT, DAVID ZIEMBA and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MURPHY
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
SUZANNE MURPHY and VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
OAKES v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01043
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE MARIE OAKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TOVAR et al v. COOK GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv06115
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, MEDICAL ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, INC., COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN SUZANNE TOVAR and CHAD TOVAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RENDER v. PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
CHRIS RENDER
Defendant:
PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION and SUZANNE BLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAUL v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2020cv00439
Plaintiff:
E'NGAI MAUL
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, STEPHANIE SEERING, DANIEL LUNDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
