Cases 31 - 40 of 2,225
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackiss v. Stumpf
as 7:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kahlyl Ackiss
Defendant:
T. Stumpf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonacci v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Mr. Louis B Antonacci and Louis B Antonacci
Defendant:
Rahm Israel Emanuel, Stephen Brett Shapiro, Paul J Kiernan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Taylor v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Taylor
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin Macoy, T. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Sussex 1 State Prison, Kevin McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
William T. McDonald
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Primelending, A Plains Capital Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
