Cases 31 - 40 of 1,651
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonna v. Moses Taylor Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
William Bonna, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Taylor Hospital, Scranton Quincy Hospital, LLC, Commonwealth Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
ANGIE TAYLOR
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ross and Angela Schuh
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc., CHSPSC, LLC, Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, LLC doing business as Commonwealth Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
HARRISON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD HARRISON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PATRICIA THOMPSON, KURT SUESSER, PAUL BROCKLEHURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. PIPIK et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
TERRELL TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSHUA PIPIK, DAVID FLAHTERNY, EBONY MARCELLE-RUDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mickens v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Rashan Mickens
Defendant:
Sharon Clark, Heather Haldeman, A.J. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
