Cases 31 - 40 of 60
STEELE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2016cv08468
Plaintiff:
YUSEF STEELE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL SCHUSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ULYSSE v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv07845
Petitioner:
GREGORY ULYSSE
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Riccardi et al
as 1:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Smith
Defendant:
John Riccardi, Peter E. Warshaw, Vernon L. McGowan, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2016cv02586
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONALD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2016cv02246
Petitioner:
BARRINGTON MCDONALD
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOCKADAY v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2016cv00762
Plaintiff:
AARON HOCKADAY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE , NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHEILAH COLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shammah v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 3:2015cv06727
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Shammah
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Dan Kobil, Ronan Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Shammah v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 1:2015cv06713
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Shammah
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Dan Kobil, Ronan Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
