Cases 31 - 40 of 1,293
Roy v. Town of Easthampton et al
as 3:2023cv30128
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lee Roy
Defendant:
Town of Easthampton, Luis A Rivera and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Michaelson v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2023cv13164
Plaintiff:
Clifford Michaelson and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Garcia v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv30130
Plaintiff:
Adamaris Garcia
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12525
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Murray v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv30122
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murray
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hurt v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv12806
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Neon Pro-Painters LLC v. Buttigieg et al
as 1:2023cv12998
Plaintiff:
Neon Pro-Painters LLC
Defendant:
Pete Buttigieg, Jeff Zients, Alex Azar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company v. AC Evolution, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12195
Defendant:
Adam S. Bowser, AC Evolution, LLC, Adam Bowser and others
Plaintiff:
Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company
Cross Defendant:
Town of Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
