Cases 31 - 40 of 296
Thompson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 0:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thompson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company v. Thompson
as 0:2022cv03176
Plaintiff:
Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Adams v. Thompson et al
as 0:2022cv03047
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lee Adams
Defendant:
Mark Thompson, Kathleen A. Loomis, County of Hennepin, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huntington National Bank v. Senergy Consulting Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
Huntington National Bank
Defendant:
Senergy Consulting Group, Inc. and Andra Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thompson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01352
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Thompson
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Thompson v. USA
as 0:2022cv01310
Petitioner:
Clyde Scott Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thompson v. Minnesota Department of Correction's St. Cloud Legal Mail
as 0:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Thompson and Pete A. Thompson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Correction's St. Cloud Legal Mail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Itasca County et al
as 0:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Debra Faye Pierce
Defendant:
Itasca County, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Fairview Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
