Cases 31 - 40 of 186
Trejo v. Biden
as 21-51204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Robert Trejo
Defendant / Appellee:
Joe Biden, President, Rick Perry, Vice President, John Doe, Vice President and others
Williams V. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03660
Defendant:
Reginald Kenta Williams
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01103
Defendant:
Melissa Hernandez Trejo, Joe Biden, Rick Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robert Trejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palma v. Abbott
as 21-20588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Palma
Defendant / Appellee:
Greg Abbott, State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General, Harris County Appraisal District, Roland Altinger and others
Bay Area Unitarian v. Paxton
as 21-20491
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bay Area Unitarian Universalist Church, Drink Houston Better, L.L.C., doing business as Antidote Coffee and Perk You Later, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Presiding Officer Kim Lemaux
LanghamIn re: Langham
as 21-185
Petitioner:
In re: EARL LANGHAM, JR.
Respondent:
GREGG ABBOTT, TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Copeland v. IRS
as 21-10854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, Joy South, Individually, Stephen Schrader, Individually and others
Searcy v. Paxton
as 21-40602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Helen Truscott, Attorney, Jennifer Burnett, Attorney and others
Luevano v. Abbott
as 21-50479
Respondent / Appellee:
Gregg Abbott, State of Texas Attorney General and Governor Rick Perry
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jaime Luevano
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
