Cases 31 - 40 of 153
PACHECO v. WALMART INC. et al
as 5:2020cv03925
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC.
Plaintiff:
MYRIAN VASQUEZ PACHECO and MYRIAN VAZQUEZ PACHECO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NUNEZ III v. VASQUEZ
as 5:2020cv03840
Defendant:
JOSE ANTHONY VASQUEZ
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON-VAZQUEZ v. VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ et al
as 5:2020cv03433
Defendant:
RAMIRO VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, RAMON VAZQUEZ and RAMON G VASQUEZ doing business as ALBERT BROWN CARRIER
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CINTRON-VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINTRON-VAZQUEZ v. VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2020cv03433
Defendant:
RAMIRO VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, RAMON VAZQUEZ and RAMON G VASQUEZ
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CINTRON-VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
VASQUEZ v. CDI CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv01044
Plaintiff:
JUAN C. VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CDI CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. DAVIS, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
VASQUEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04911
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
ANA VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKEESPORT BLACK STUDENT UNION et al v. MCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2019cv00405
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WEBB, DEJA NEWBY, JASONA BELYEU and others
Defendant:
MARK P. HOLTZMAN, JR. and MCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
DAVID ONSTEAD, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DOUGLAS ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
