Cases 31 - 40 of 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
McKenzie v. Cleveland et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Danita McKenzie
Defendant:
Thomas Cleveland, J Adams and C Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Duvall v. Warden,Talladega FCI
as 1:2022cv01332
Petitioner:
Benjamin Wade Elliott Duvall
Respondent:
Warden,Talladega FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter v. Multimetco Inc
as 1:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Elijah Wade Hunter
Defendant:
Multimetco Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Yauger, Jr. v. Greene County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Benny Earl Younger, Sr. and Benny Earl Yauger, Jr
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriffs Office, Greene County Jail, Advanced Correctional Health Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hunter v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Hunter
Respondent:
Matthew Wade and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
David Lee Smith
Defendant:
Heath Jackson, Lt. Richard Hetrick, Wade L. Hartly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Robertson et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Tavars D. Lynch
Defendant:
Barry E. Robertson, Matthew Wade, Eric Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
