Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Kirby v. Chief US Marshal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01393
Plaintiff: Stephen Kirby
Defendant: Chief US Marshal, Warden FCI Elkton and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 4:2016cv01207
Petitioner: Douglas Reed
Respondent: Chief US Marshal, DSCC Director and Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv01372
Petitioner: Douglas Reed
Respondent: Chief US Marshal, DSCC Director and Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. Chief US Marshal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01339
Petitioner: Douglas Reed
Respondent: Chief US Marshal, DSCC Director and Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Warden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00572
Plaintiff: Charles Leonard Galloway
Defendant: Warden FCI - Elkton, J. Dunlop and M. Tomko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
OLLIE v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00279
Petitioner: JOSEPH LEE OLLIE
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN, FCI ELKTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abrar Haque v. Warden, FCI Elkton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-4219
Petitioner - Appellant: ABRAR U. HAQUE
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, FCI ELKTON
Kenneth Simpson v. Warden FCI Elkton
as 15-3841
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH SIMPSON
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN FCI ELKTON
Richard Labelle v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 15-3787
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD LAYNE LABELLE
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, FCI ELKTON
Sonny Peguero v. Warden
as 15-3471
Petitioner - Appellant: SONNY PEGUERO
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Elkton

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?