Cases 31 - 40 of 72
BROWN v. BERRY et al
as 1:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
CURTIS A BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN FRED GAMMAGE, CPT MARY BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CO2 BRANDON GOODMAN, UNIT MANAGER BARBARA CUMMING, Warden WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03354
Petitioner:
Michael James Williams
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Warden Walter Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIDSON v. AKUNWANNE et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERALD A DAVIDSON
Defendant:
Doctor IKECHUKWU AKUNWANNE, Warden WALTER BERRY, LIEUTENANT STEPHEN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. AKUNWANNE et al
as 5:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
GERALD A DAVIDSON
Defendant:
Doctor IKECHUKWU AKUNWANNE, Warden WALTER BERRY, LIEUTENANT STEPHEN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
CHERYL ANN FRAZIER, JUANITA THORPE, Warden TOMMY BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTBROOKS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00192
Defendant:
MARTIN ERIC, BALDWIN STATE PRISON, WARDEN LAWRENCE EASELEY and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WESTBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Berry
as 2:2021cv00046
Respondent:
Warden Walter Berry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
David Lane Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DILLARD v. BERRY
as 3:2021cv00037
Respondent:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY
Petitioner:
TONY MCLANE DILLARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00081
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, CO2 ERIKA SHINHOLSTER, REGENIA WOMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
