Cases 31 - 40 of 283
EL MALIK-BEY v. LIEBEL
as 1:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
MUFTI ABDUL EL MALIK-BEY
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Liebel et al
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, Muft Abdul El-Malik- Ali, Frances L Smith-Bey and others
Defendant:
David Liebel, Ismael Aleem, William Croto and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Malik-Bey-Ali v. Liebel
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali
Defendant:
David Liebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hotep-El v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Yosuf Hotep-El and Yusuf Hotep-El
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EL v. MARION SUPERIOR COURT 10 et al
as 1:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
CHEYOU EL
Defendant:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT 10, REGINA TIDWELL, MARIA MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPANN-EL v. NEW CASTLE WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
RICHARD D. SPANN-EL
Respondent:
NEW CASTLE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS-EL v. VANIHEL
as 1:2022cv02331
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS-EL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00550
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann-El v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00932
Petitioner:
Richard A Spann-El
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann-El - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00797
Petitioner:
Richard A Spann-El
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
