Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Wint v. Georgia CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Loisann Wint
Defendant:
Georgia CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. doing business as CVS Pharmacy #4582, DGS Capital Investments LLC doing business as CVS Pharmacy #4582, XYZ Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
GAINES v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv04187
Plaintiff:
DORIAN GAINES
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03140
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. GREEN
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNGER v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
JASHAWN YOUNGER
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
MUHAMIN BEY
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARROW v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv02296
Plaintiff:
VONTRA MARROW
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree-McCrorey et al v. State Treasurer Office et al
as 3:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey, Andrew McCrorey, Jr and Mattie P McCrorey
Defendant:
State Treasurer Office, City Hall, State Capital and others
CRUZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRUZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
JOHN K. DENNIS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FirstBank Puerto Rico v. Mahepath et al
as 1:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
FirstBank Puerto Rico
Defendant:
Beverly Mahepath, Clyde W Wint, Estate Questa Verde Townhouses and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
