Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Felton et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 5:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Ceasar Felton and Mary Felton
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank , Morris & Associates , Federal National Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Felton et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 3:2013cv00829
Plaintiff:
Ceasar Felton and Mary Felton
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank , Morris & Associates , Federal National Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-60579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Yazoo County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee
Defendant:
Yazoo County, Mississippi , Tommy Vaughn and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. Yazoo County et al
as 5:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Hawkins and The Estate of Ruthie Hawkins
Defendant:
Yazoo County , Yazoo County Sheriff's Department and All Unknown Officers and Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPENCER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00734
Petitioner:
ROLLIN LEE SPENCER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and YAZOO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas Horn v. Thomas Vaughan, et al
as 11-60024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWIN HORN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS E. VAUGHAN, also known as Tommy Vaughan, Yazoo County Sheriff, SHERRY VAUGHAN and YAZOO COUNTY MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
