Cases 31 - 40 of 388
SHELTON v. BIZLENDER, LLC
as 2:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
BIZLENDER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SHELTON v. NEW BRIDGE MERCHANT CAPITAL LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01388
Defendant:
GUISEPPE TURRICIANO, NEW BRIDGE MERCHANT CAPITAL LLC and JOSEPH TURRUCIANO
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SHELTON v. PREMIUM MERCHANT FUNDING ONE, LLC
as 2:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
PREMIUM MERCHANT FUNDING ONE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SHELTON v. ALPINE FUNDING PARTNERS, LLC
as 2:2022cv00907
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
ALPINE FUNDING PARTNERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SMITH v. EVERETT
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
NASHAE N. SMITH
Defendant:
CYNTHIA EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
SHELTON v. AFG FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00294
Defendant:
MEHRDAD MOSAYEBI-HERAVI, AFG FUNDING, LLC, MEHRDAD HERAVI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
SMITH v. HARRISON et al
as 2:2021cv05120
Plaintiff:
NASHAE NAEISHA SMITH
Defendant:
BENNETTE HARRISON, ANDRE MARTINO, CYNTHIA L. EVERETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv04392
Plaintiff:
DERRICK EVERETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALL JOHN DOE and UNITED STATES MARSHALL RICHARD ROE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVERETTS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALBERT EVERETTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, SGT JOHN DOE "WALTMIRE", JOHN DOE OSHLICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
