Cases 31 - 40 of 565,121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. DRAAM, Corp et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
DRAAM, Corp, 4MACS, LLC, David MacMelville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Summit Human Capital, LLC v. Harkins et al
as 3:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Summit Human Capital, LLC
Defendant:
John Harkins, Grace Douglas and Think Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Kapoor v. Evans
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Manu Kapoor
Defendant:
J. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Credit Repair Organization Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ivan
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Trashon Williams
Defendant:
Ivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge St. Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge St. Prison, C.O. Johnsin and C.O. Kennety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sheila Andrews
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
