Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Moore et al v. Martin
as 4:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Mark Moore , Michael Harrod and William Chris Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Arkansas Democratic Party
as 4:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
John Wolfe
Defendant:
Arkansas Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffers et al v. Beebe et al
as 2:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Future Mae Jeffers , Mary Jeffers , Henry Peacock and others
Defendant:
Mike Beebe , Mark Martin , Dustin McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Harris v. Texarkana, Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2011cv04124
Plaintiff:
Laney Harris
Defendant:
Texarkana, Arkansas, City of , N. Wayne Smith (Mayor) , N. Wayne Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. McElroy et al
as 5:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
Onie Norman
Defendant:
Mark McElroy, Desha County Quorum Court, Charles Denver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Hall v. Daniels et al
as 4:2010cv00515
Plaintiff:
Alison B Hall
Defendant:
Charlie Daniels and Pat O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
McGruder et al v. Beebe et al
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Julious McGruder, Loretta Jarrett, Calvin Holden and others
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Arkansas Supreme Court, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Green Party of Arkansas et al v. Daniels
as 4:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
Green Party of Arkansas, Mark Swaney and Rebekah Kennedy
Defendant:
Charlie Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hollman v. United States Electoral College
as 5:2008cv05244
Plaintiff:
Marcus Russell Hollman
Defendant:
United States Electoral College
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mlakar v. Alma, AR, City of et al
as 2:2008cv02114
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Mlakar
Defendant:
Alma, AR, City of, John - Ballentine, Jennifer Moon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.