Cases 31 - 40 of 26,316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TURNER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
YEHOWSHUA I TURNER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. SCHREIBER et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY and OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JAMES SCHREIBER, JR, BRENDA SCHREIBER, JAMIE P KEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CAVALIERE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON CAVALIERE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
KAREN K VALE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
