Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 41 - 50 of 231
The Mississippi Bar v. Knight
as 3:2020ad00008
Respondent: Jeffrey Dixon Knight
Interested Party: Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff: The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. King
as 3:2020ad00007
Interested Party: Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent: Ralph P. King, II
Plaintiff: The Mississippi Bar
Dejean v. Esparza et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Plaintiff: Arthur B. Dejean
Defendant: John Does 1-5, Leonardo B. Esparza and Chale Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Mississippi Bar v. Johnson
as 3:2020ad00006
Interested Party: Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff: The Mississippi Bar
Respondent: Richard Vaughn Johnson, Jr.
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2020cv00177
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Arthur Nelson Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
The Mississippi Bar v. Byrd
as 3:2020ad00005
Interested Party: Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent: Sibyl Caver Byrd
Plaintiff: The Mississippi Bar
Chapman v. Collums et al
as 1:2020cv00178
Defendant: John Logan and Luke Collums
Plaintiff: Arthur C. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Mississippi Bar v. Walker
as 3:2020ad00004
Interested Party: Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent: Randolph Walker
Plaintiff: The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Mauk-Williams
as 3:2020ad00003
Respondent: Charlene Mauk-Williams
Interested Party: Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff: The Mississippi Bar
Moore v. Sanders et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00165
Defendant: Travis Patten, Lillie Blackmon Sanders, Walter Armstrong and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Arthur Lee Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?