Cases 41 - 50 of 387
Due v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Matthew R. Hoffman and Robert T. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Due v. Dawson et al
as 8:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Robert T. Dawson, Matthew R. Hoffman and Brian D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Petersen v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 8:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Petersen
Defendant:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 4:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Garcia v. Coombs et al
as 4:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Z. Garcia
Defendant:
David W. Coombs, Jr. and Jacob P. Betsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
