Cases 41 - 50 of 674
Carlson v. Nelnet Servicing, LLC
as 4:2022cv03184
Plaintiff:
Robert Carlson
Defendant:
Nelnet Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mays v. Magnotti et al
as 8:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Robert Mays, III
Defendant:
Louis Magnotti, Yvonne Wilcox, Warner Music Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Due v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Matthew R. Hoffman and Robert T. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Due v. Dawson et al
as 8:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Robert T. Dawson, Matthew R. Hoffman and Brian D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Eggers et al v. Evnen
as 4:2022cv03089
Plaintiff:
Crista Eggers and NMM
Defendant:
Robert Evnen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. Roberts
as 8:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Elliott and Robert/Yukie Lola Christian Elliott
Defendant:
Justine A. Roberts and Omaha Douglas Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight et al v. United States et al
as 8:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight, Alphonso V. Frazier, II and Phyllis M. Knight Bey D.M.
Defendant:
United States and Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 4:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
