Cases 41 - 50 of 300
Chapman v. Geter
as 2:2020cv00098
Respondent:
Linda Geter
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Champlin v. Chapman Hall Realtors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03790
Defendant:
Susan Protos and Chapman Hall Realtors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Champlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Ruffin-Chapman v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Wal-Mart Store #01-02860, John Does 1-10, Walmart Inc. doing business as Wal-Mart Stores #01-02860 and others
Plaintiff:
Mikysha Ruffin-Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roether v. State of Georgia et al
as 2:2020cv00092
Defendant:
McIntosh County DFCS, Does 1-100, Inclusive, Daniel B. Collipp and others
Plaintiff:
Hollie Roether
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Chapman
as 1:2020cv03622
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hanson
Defendant:
Luther Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapman S.R. v. Proctor et al
as 2:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Grant, Mr. FNU Phillips, Charles Dillio and others
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Chapman S.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00088
Defendant:
J RICKS, JOE CHAPMAN, COREY WARD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ESTEN WILLIAMS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC v. CHAPMAN
as 1:2020cv00152
Plaintiff:
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC F/K/A CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC, NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC and CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC
Defendant:
Chester W Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Ellis v. Ellis et al
as 4:2020cv00170
Respondent:
Roundtable Property & Development, LLC, Thomas Chapman Causby, Gareth Ross Rogers and others
Petitioner:
Marlee Tatum Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Johnson v. Chapman's Garage, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Chapman's Garage, LLC, James Chapman and Jamie Chapman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
