Cases 41 - 50 of 170
Norman v. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv00262
Defendant:
Cook Med Institute, Inc., William Cook Europe, APS, Cook Denmark Holding, APS and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Lou Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hightower v. Frito-Lay Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Norman L Hightower
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc and Frito-Lay Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harmon et al v. Norman City of et al
as 5:2018cv00688
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Norman City of and Jeff Robertson
Plaintiff:
Shane Dodson, Toby Harmon and Tammi Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Barton v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Norman C. Barton, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dowd v. Harrah Dentistry and Braces PLLC et al
as 5:2018cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jessica L Dowd
Defendant:
Harrah Dentistry and Braces PLLC , Kingfisher Dental PLLC , El Reno Dental PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maxwell v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Maxwell
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Mike Norman, Tim King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nicks et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Willie Nicks , James Allison , Olawate Aberibigbe and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc., EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Lone Star Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hubbs v. Norman et al
as 6:2017cv00451
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gary Hubbs, Jr.
Respondent:
Steve Norman , Jeremy Wade , Joey Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
