Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Olsen v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00149
Defendant:
Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Henry Olsen, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Olsen v. Preferred HomeCare et al
as 2:2017cv00547
Defendant:
Medical Depot, Inc. and Preferred HomeCare/Lifecare Solutions
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Olsen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Olsen v. Geico Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00503
Defendant:
Geico Insurance Agency, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David A Olsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Agha-Khan v. Wells Fargo Bank NA A US Bank et al
as 2:2016cv02928
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Defendant:
Chicago Title Company, Johnathan J Damen, Executive Trustee Services LLC and others
702) 471-7070 (fax:
Merscorp Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Salat v. Breslow et al
as 2:2016cv02670
Defendant:
Ruben Aquino, Director Bruce Breslow, F Caseres and others
Plaintiff:
Imhotep Salat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Olsen v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2015cv00367
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Carl Henry Olsen, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Not Used
as 2:2014cv01832
Defendant:
City of Boulder City, Peggy Leavitt, DUNCAN MCCOY and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Not Used
as 2:2014cv01829
Defendant:
City of Boulder City, MCCOY DUNCAN, Peggy Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
