Cases 41 - 50 of 115
DAVIS v. Pierce Packaging Co.
as 2:2016cv02916
Plaintiff:
HEATHER DAVIS
Defendant:
Pierce Packaging Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coggins v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2016cv00613
Defendant:
Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margie Ann S. Coggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Deauntai Pierce
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Robert Arnold, Medical Provider of Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Pierce v. USA
as 2:2016cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald Aaron Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lyle v. Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00864
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Lyle
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Tennessee, ABL Food Service, f/n/u Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grogg v. Perry et al
as 1:2015cv01259
Plaintiff:
Audie Grogg
Defendant:
Grady Perry, C.C.A./H.C.C.F., Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellzey et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00832
Plaintiff:
Vanetta Page, Lynda Matus, Kathy Ellzey and others
Defendant:
Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation and Community Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Steele v. Edwards et al
as 3:2015cv00818
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Steele
Defendant:
Charles Edwards, John Fuson , Douglas Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Micky Miller, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
