Cases 41 - 50 of 90,455
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01343
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crews v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Jason Crews
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bender v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01350
Plaintiff:
Amy Patricia Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bollin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M Bollin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gagne et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gagne and Suzette Gagne
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Kevin Cost, Lee Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Torrez v. Signet Jewelers Limited
as 2:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Claudette Torrez
Defendant:
Signet Jewelers Limited
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Harris v. Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company LLC
as 2:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
Linda Harris
Defendant:
Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CIGNA Healthcare Incorporated v. Lugo et al
as 2:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
CIGNA Healthcare Incorporated
Defendant:
Roberto Lugo and Friedl Richardson PC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
