Cases 41 - 50 of 581
HOWARD v. WEDDELL et al
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOWARD
Defendant:
BRANDON WEDDELL and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey, III v. Jezierski et al
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Howard A Bailey, III
Defendant:
Eric Jezierski, Daniel Byrd, Gayle Lois Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HOWARD v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HOWARD
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Zern et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HOWARD
Defendant:
BRAD ZERN, AMANDA LANGE, NORTHWEST ALLEN COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMALLWOOD v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
William Howard Easley and William Easley
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THARPE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
JOSEPH HOWARD THARPE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TERHUNE et al v. PITT et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
GERALD TERHUNE and THERESA SPERRY
Defendant:
NATHAN PITT, JACQUELINE A. DUFF, CORY OFFERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gill v. Hammond The City of et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Mark A Gill
Defendant:
Hammond The City of, Thomas M McDermott Jr, The Hammond Police Dpt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN, HINES, WILSON, DOUGLAS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN, ANTWAN HINES, HOWARD HARRIS and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
