Cases 41 - 50 of 93,284
Shleifer et al v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv80713
Plaintiff:
Scott L. Shleifer and Elena Shleifer
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Noa v. Strange
as 3:2024cv50221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Noa
Defendant:
Scott C Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Scott v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04723
Plaintiff:
Annmarie Scott
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barry v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Barry
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Christina Reagle, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell #747638 v. Fisk et al
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Andrew Michael Russell #747638
Defendant:
Chad Fisk, Jonathan Kraai, Natascha Hirdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Reese v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Scott Reese
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Joachin v. AIG et al
as 1:2024cv04335
Plaintiff:
Nadine Joachin
Defendant:
AIG, The United States Life Insurance Company, Scott Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
