Cases 41 - 50 of 5,072
Leppien v. Harry et al
as 3:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leppien
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, M. Gourley, A. Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04115
Plaintiff:
LONNIE WRIGHT
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, MATHEW MICELLI, MD and JOSEPH WALSH, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Wright v. Rivello et al
as 1:2023cv01553
Petitioner:
Dwayne Wright
Respondent:
John Rivello and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. EBY, LLC
as 3:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Eby, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
JOHNSON, et al v. WRIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL, INC., et al
as 2:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS JOHNSON and NICHOLAS GREATHOUSE
Defendant:
WRIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL, INC. and W.D. WRIGHT CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KYLE v. WRIGHT et al
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
KEITH KYLE
Defendant:
MATTHEW WRIGHT, CALLIHAN and AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SELTZ v. SWEPI LP
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
CAROL SPELLMAN SELTZ, SUMNER R. BEMIS, GEORGENE BEMIS and others
Defendant:
SWEPI LP, SWEPI LLC, SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
