Cases 41 - 50 of 485
YOUNG v. KNOX COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. KOLHOUSE
as 2:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
MARLON LEE YOUNG and MARION LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
MICHAEL KOLHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, ZUBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. COUCH et al
as 1:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
CHRIS COUCH, TOM FOUST and JOSHUA SCHERSCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Elkhart General Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Dianna Graham
Defendant:
Elkhart General Hospital, Elkhart Clinic, Carl Risk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Young
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HOLLINS et al v. CARDOSI et al
as 4:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
DALTON HOLLINS and DYLAN HOLLINS
Defendant:
MEGAN CARDOSI, KAREN LINDSEY, HEATHER ARNOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Petitioner:
EMORY YOUNG
Respondent:
S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
YOUNG v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv02019
Plaintiff:
ROBIN YOUNG
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
