Cases 41 - 50 of 135
Northland Baptist Church of St. Paul, Minnesota et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2020cv01100
Defendant:
Tony Palumbo, John Choi, Governor Tim Walz and others
Plaintiff:
A J Hulse Company, The, Myron's Cards and Gifts, Inc., Northland Baptist Church of St. Paul, Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian Action League of Minnesota et al v. Freeman
as 0:2020cv01081
Plaintiff:
Christian Action League of Minnesota and Ann Redding
Defendant:
Mike Freeman
Intervenor:
Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Cenlar FSB et al
as 0:2020cv00967
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB, CitiMortage, Inc and Christian Bank & Trust
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Thoresen v. Titus
as 0:2020cv00769
Respondent:
Jeff Titus
Petitioner:
Joseph Christian Thoresen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stainbrook et al v. White et al
as 0:2020cv00422
Defendant:
Steven S. Eckman, Eckman, Strandness & Egan, P.A., Zachary White and others
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Christian and Randy Stainbrook
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Brooks v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00386
Plaintiff:
Christian Brooks
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Morton v. Park Christian School et al
as 0:2019cv03134
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Morton
Defendant:
Christopher Nellermoe, Joshua Lee, Timothy Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicholson v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02498
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christian B. Nicholson
Medley et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02247
Plaintiff:
Joshua Schrodt, Edward Brunetti, Jeffrey Kilcrease and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Patton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02257
Plaintiff:
Terry Youtsey, Nealson Foster, Cyrus McCoy and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
