Cases 41 - 50 of 863
Odisho v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2023cv11670
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ODISHO
Defendant:
City of Warren, Daniel Toth, Robert Hamilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Murray v. Douglas
as 2:2023cv11636
Petitioner:
Kirk Murray
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan and Adam Douglas
Jackson #748757 v. Bolton et al
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cornell Jackson #748757
Defendant:
Quentin Bolton, Unknown Hoult, Unknown Bomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul et al v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Margaret Geary, Ronald S Arnett, Mark Paul and others
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Jacqueline Soloman, Nicholas Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dobronski v. Sbaiti & Company PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv11591
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Sbaiti & Company PLLC, National Intake Center, LLC, Frederick Michael Branin and others
Anderson et al v. Autoliv, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv11601
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
Anita Victory, Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hamas v. Shiawassee, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11590
Plaintiff:
George Hamas
Defendant:
Shiawassee County, Matthew Stewart, Douglas E. Corwin and others
Morrison et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Donald Morrison, Peter Shaw, Douglas Berhns and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Shaver v. Nagy
as 4:2023cv11573
Petitioner:
Dawson Douglas Shaver
Respondent:
M.D.O.C. and Noah Nagy
Aguilar #950311 v. Pelky et al
as 2:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Joel Aguilar #950311
Defendant:
K. Pelky, D. Viitala, Unknown Hoult and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
