Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Bullwinkel v. United States Department of Energy et al
as 1:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
Gary Bullwinkel
Defendant:
United States Department of Energy, Stephen Chu, Anthony Cugini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Dixon v. Marion County, TN et al
as 1:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Vernon N Dixon
Defendant:
Marion County, TN, Ronnie Bo Burnett, Tammy McAlpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Marion County, TN et al
as 4:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Vernon N Dixon
Defendant:
Marion County, TN, Ronnie Bo Burnett, Tammy McAlpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Burnette et al
as 1:2010cv00335
Plaintiff:
Vernon Dixon
Defendant:
Ronnie Burnette, Tammy McAlpin, Sowter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilgore Flares Company, LLC v. Maltenieks
as 1:2010cv01208
Plaintiff:
Kilgore Flares Company, LLC
Defendant:
James Maltenieks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Greene County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Ruey L Davis
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff's Department, Greeneville Police Department and Stewart Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dimery v. Hamilton County Jail et al
as 1:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dimery
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail, Richard Shockley, Rodney Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilgore v. Frazier
as 1:2010cv00002
Petitioner:
Phillip Raye Kilgore
Respondent:
David Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
