Cases 41 - 50 of 4,537
Williams #243786 v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Marcus Henry Williams #243786
Defendant:
Dell Baker, M. Truxell, M. Kirky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv10724
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Steward Robinson
Defendant:
Daniel Evans, Robert M. Hayes, Robert Mendham and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Preston v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10701
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Cook, Ryhdall and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Forman
as 2:2024cv10678
Plaintiff:
Carmen I Lee
Defendant:
M Forman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of et al
as 2:2024cv10655
Plaintiff:
Janaka M Collins and Oladimeji Mubaraq Agbomabiwon
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director of, US Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drago v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10636
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Drago
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Huntington National Bank, N.A. v. Sigismond et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
The Huntington National Bank and Huntington National Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Steven Sigismond, Donald Wyper, Steven M. Sigismond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
